Pages

Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts

Wednesday, 24 July 2013

Introducing...me!

Hey! I realised recently that my blog doesn’t really show you what I’m up to, and who I am. Surely if you’re reading my blog you wanna know who the hell you’re reading about? Don’t worry, this won’t be too much like an “about me” page on LinkedIn, but more like my motivation for writing the articles I like to write about, and a little what I’m up to and what I’m planning in the future.

So, as I’ve already mentioned a million times, I am a graduate, about to embark on the rocky path to employment. You may notice I write a lot on race, and I do so because issues concerning race cause the strongest reaction. I am half Jamaican, but my father was born in Yorkshire, and is without a doubt, the most Yorkshire man you’ll probably meet. Basically, all he’s just missing is his flat cap and whippet.

I don’t deny I am “white-passing”, which means you’d probably mistake me for being white and as a result, I can “pass for white” if I chose to. Despite this, I have still experienced racism. I’ve been casually called “n*gger” more than once, had people downright refuse to believe I’m mixed race, someone saying my mother must be “as white as a ghost”, even been made to overhear a group of classmates talk about, amongst other racist topics, killing mixed race children on arrival.

I have even had mild institutional racism thrown at me, take for example, the time I was told I need a special helper at school because of my Afro-Caribbean heritage. All children of African or Caribbean descent were offered helpers, who sat in at least one lesson. Funnily enough, she sat in on an English lesson, where I was top set. I went on to achieve a 2:1 degree classification in English and Film. Let’s just say, she was a little bored and never came back.

I think it is important to emphasise that I don’t pretend to know what it is like to be black. I know how privileged I am, the most racism I experience is when I tell people I’m mixed race. However, I think my experience is important to take note of, because it shows how this “colour blind” notion, that assumes race is just about skin colour, is actually a load of rubbish. If I, an undeniably white-looking woman, can still experience racism, then how can racism simply be about skin colour? A blind man can still be racist, as he is still in contact with society and can form judgement based on what he hears and feels. There is a Dave Chapelle sketch that illustrates this quite well actually.

So, enough about race for a while, if you wish to know more, please ask me in the comments, and I’m more than willing to answer. I quickly want to mention I am a feminist, as I think most politically-aware/interested women should be. I used to be completely anti-feminism, right up until A Levels. What is important to understand about anti-feminists, is that the vast majority of the time, they do not know what feminism is. For me, I assumed feminism was an out-dated movement, trying to be equal to men when we already had everything we needed. I was made to mention it in class once, and even as I spoke I couldn’t form a legit answer as to why I hated feminism.

These two previously mentioned factors, as well as being your average, politically-minded unemployed graduate motivate me to write. I don’t feel that I have anything ground-breaking to announce to the world just yet, as my opinions are still growing and forming. However, the best way for me to understand my opinions is to write them down. Maybe nothing will happen, I’ll get a job with a furniture company and write about chairs for the rest of my life. Or maybe I have the possibility to become like my favourite journalist Gary Younge, who is a highly successful black British journalist in America, and has written a few books. Don’t get me wrong, my plans for the future involve marketing and advertising, but I like to keep my career options open.

So, what you can expect from me in the future is hopefully more on this blog. I am throwing myself into writing this summer, and have already written tonnes for Wireless Magazine and Grads blog. I am three quarters of the way through ‘No Place Like Home: A Black Briton’s Journey Through the American South’ by Gary Younge, so I plan on writing a review of that, as well as more book reviews.

I also want to try and implement a weekly news round-up, where I sum up my take on the week’s news. I tried doing this before, but then the Wendy Davis filibuster happened, along with the Minority Voter's court ruling, possible UK student fees privatisation and a whole lot of important events. I ended up writing a huge article before realising there was too much happening at once. If I do start that, it will be on a Friday evening or Saturday.

Lastly I want to include something about my time here in Switzerland, where I’m learning German. However, I’m not sure how to implement that, so we’ll see later how I fit some of that in.

Anyway, I hope this wasn’t too lengthy and vague, but I just fancied a change of tone. From now on you’ll see a lot more of “me” in my articles, not some cold opinion pieces from somebody you don’t even know. I really hope this “new tone” breathes fresh air into this place, and brings in some more readers!

Thanks for reading!

Monday, 14 January 2013

Julie Birchill's Attack on the Trans Community



Apologies for my late post, with Christmas and coursework deadlines and internships (visit moonproject.co.uk if you want to help me out!) I’ve been bowled over with work. I just wanted to squeeze in a post about the recent controversy with The Observer.

Yesterday, Sunday columnist Julie Birchill wrote a horribly transphobic article in an attempt to defend a fellow writer Suzanne Moore. Moore said in an article for The New Statesman that women were too often expected to look like "a Brazilian transsexual". Of course, the Twitter world attacked Moore, who instead of humbly apologising for being transphobic (and not acknowledging the high murder rate of Brazilian transexuals), ended the argument with “People can just fuck off really. Cut their dicks off and be more feminist than me. Good for them”.

The article by Burchill did nothing but make things worse as she launched an a vitriolic attack on transsexuals, calling them “screaming mimis”, “dicks in chicks' clothing”, “shims” and “shemales”. She also compared their attack to black-and-white minstrels telling Usain Bolt how to run. My personal favourite was how she made the bizarre assumption that all trans people are middle class and highly educated. I'm pretty sure it is possible to be trans and not be rolling in money.

Anyway, I am going to leave it unsaid how offensive the article is. Burchill's vitriolic attack is clear to see, and fortunately most are opposed to it. What I want to talk about it The Observer's decision to remove the piece.

The decision has split some people. Those who think they should have left it are mixed. Some are claiming she has freedom of speech, which is a touchy subject. Many people mix "freedom of speech" with "being an asshat". Just because someone is free to express their opinions, that doesn't mean they can be as offensive as they want. Also many people have double standards when it comes to freedom of speech. If the article was a racist, homophobic, sexist diatribe people would be less eager to cry "freedom of speech".

Some feel the article should remain as to continue the debate. However, the article brings down the whole topic of debate, and to continue it there is to validate Burchill's arguments. This debate can be carried out elsewhere in a more intellectual way than simply spewing hateful slurs against transgender people.

I feel the article was rightly removed by the editor. To leave such a hateful piece up would be completely unprofessional. If the article remains then so do the insults. Her belittling of the struggles of transgender people cuts right to the hearts of many, and so by deleting the piece, The Observer can cut the level of affected. If people are curious they most likely will find the article re-published somewhere (many readers said they'd saved the article for such a scenario).

Finally, if the article had remained, an apology from The Observer would not seem legitimate, by letting it remain that would qualify it as a valid piece of journalism, and also not register its offensiveness. What they needed to do was cut ties from it as soon as possible. They can't disassociate with it entirely, but by removing it they make the statement that they should not tolerate such bullying.
What do you think? Should the article have been left up? Leave a comment below!